United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

 

International Registration No. 1585471

 

Notice of Provisional Full Refusal

 

Deadline for responding.  The USPTO must receive applicant’s response within six months of the “date on which the notification was sent to WIPO (mailing date)” located on the WIPO cover letter, or the U.S. application will be abandoned (see https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks-application-process/abandoned-applications for information on abandonment).  To confirm the mailing date, go to the USPTO’s Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) database at https://tsdr.uspto.gov/, select “US Serial, Registration, or Reference No.,” enter the U.S. application serial number in the blank text box, and click on “Documents.”  The mailing date used to calculate the response deadline is the “Create/Mail Date” of the “IB-1rst Refusal Note.” 

 

Respond to this Office action using the USPTO’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.

 

Discussion of provisional full refusal.  This is a provisional full refusal of the request for extension of protection to the United States of the international registration, known in the United States as a U.S. application based on Trademark Act Section 66(a).  See 15 U.S.C. §§1141f(a), 1141h(c). 

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SEARCH OF USPTO DATABASE OF MARKS

The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES:

• Identification of Goods Amendment Required
• Disclaimer Required
• Translation Required
• Mark Description Required
• Applicant’s Email Address Required
• U.S. Counsel Required

 

IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS AMENDMENT REQUIRED

The wording “dairy products” is indefinite and must be amended to specify the common commercial or generic name of the goods.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.  If the goods have no common commercial or generic name, applicant must describe the products, their main purposes, and their intended uses.  See TMEP §1402.01.

 

Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:

 

International Class 29

Milk, cheese, butter, yogurt, cream,; dairy products, namely, {indicate the common name of the dairy products, e.g., beverages having a milk base, cottage cheese, sour cream, etc.}; raclette cheeses, cheese fondue, ripened cheeses, fresh unripened cheeses and cheeses in brine, white cheeses, fresh, plain or flavored cheeses, sold in paste or liquid form; all the aforesaid goods from the canton of Fribourg

 

Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods, but not to broaden or expand the goods beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Generally, any deleted goods may not later be reinserted.  See TMEP §1402.07(e).  Additionally, for applications filed under Trademark Act Section 66(a), the scope of the identification for purposes of permissible amendments is limited by the international class assigned by the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization (International Bureau); and the classification of goods may not be changed from that assigned by the International Bureau.  37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §§1401.03(d), 1904.02(b).  Further, in a multiple-class Section 66(a) application, classes may not be added or goods transferred from one existing class to another.  37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §1401.03(d).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

DISCLAIMER REQUIRED

Applicant must disclaim all the wording in the mark because it is primarily geographically descriptive of the origin of applicant’s goods.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(2); In re Societe Generale des Eaux Minerales de Vittel S.A., 824 F.2d 957, 959, 3 USPQ2d 1450, 1451-52 (Fed. Cir. 1987); TMEP §§1210.01(a), 1210.06(a), 1213.03(a).  Specifically, the identification of goods indicates that applicant’s goods originate in the canton of Fribourg.

 

Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:

 

No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “LE FRIBOURG” apart from the mark as shown.

 

For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to provide one using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage.

 

TRANSLATION REQUIRED

To permit proper examination of the application, applicant must submit an English translation of all wording in the mark because it is foreign wording.  37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(9), 2.61(b); TMEP §809.  The following English translation is suggested: 

 

The English translation of “LE FRIBOURG” is “THE FRIBOURG”.

 

TMEP §809.03.  See attached translation evidence.

 

MARK DESCRIPTION REQUIRED

Applicant must submit a description of the mark, because one was not included in the application.  37 C.F.R. §2.37; see TMEP §§808.01, 808.02.  Applications for marks not in standard characters must include an accurate and concise description of the entire mark that identifies all the literal and design elements.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.37; TMEP §§808.01, 808.02, 808.03(b).  In this case, the drawing of the mark is not in standard characters.

 

The following description is suggested, if accurate: 

 

The mark consists of the wording “LE” above “FRIBOURG”, with horizontal bars appearing above and below “FRIBOURG” and a stylized bird design appearing behind the wording.

 

APPLICANT’S EMAIL ADDRESS REQUIRED

Applicant must provide applicant’s email address, which is a requirement for a complete application.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(2); TMEP §803.05(b).  This email address cannot be identical to the primary correspondence email address of a U.S.-licensed attorney retained to represent applicant in this application.  See TMEP §803.05(b). 

 

U.S. COUNSEL REQUIRED

Applicant is required to be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney to respond to or appeal the provisional refusal because applicant’s domicile is located outside of the United States and applicant does not appear to be represented by a qualified U.S. attorney.  37 C.F.R. §2.11(a); TMEP §601.01(a).  An applicant whose domicile is located outside of the United States or its territories must be represented by an attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state or territory.  37 C.F.R. §2.11(a); TMEP §§601, 601.01(a).  In this case, applicant’s domicile is identified in the application as Switzerland.  For more information, see the U.S. Counsel webpage at https://www.uspto.gov/trademark/laws-regulations/trademark-rule-requires-foreign-applicants-and-registrants-have-us and Hiring a U.S.-licensed trademark attorney webpage at https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks-getting-started/why-hire-private-trademark-attorney.  

 

To appoint a U.S.-licensed attorney in this application, applicant should submit a completed Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Change Address or Representation form at https://teas.uspto.gov/wna/ccr/car.  The newly-appointed attorney must submit a TEAS Response to Examining Attorney Office Action form at https://teas.uspto.gov/office/roa/ indicating that an appointment of attorney has been made and address all other refusals or requirements in this action.  Alternatively, if applicant retains an attorney before filing the response, the attorney can respond to this Office action by using the appropriate TEAS response form and provide his or her attorney information in the form and sign it as applicant’s attorney.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.17(b)(1)(ii); TMEP §604.01.

 

COMMUNICATION

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although an examining attorney cannot provide legal advice, the examining attorney can provide additional explanation about the requirements in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. 

 

The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

Response guidelines.  For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each requirement in this Office action.  For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements.  Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.

 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.    

 

 

/Matthew Ruskin/

Matthew Ruskin

Examining Attorney, Law Office 106

571-272-3466

matthew.ruskin@uspto.gov

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

• Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

• Responses signed by an unauthorized party are not accepted and can cause the application to abandon. 

 

• If needed, find contact information for the supervisor of the office or unit listed in the signature block.